A total of 176 academics on Tuesday wrote to the principal scientific advisor to the Government of India, expressing concern about the new selection criteria for the Vigyan Yuva Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Award.
This came after 26 eminent scientists wrote to the principal scientific advisor on August 30 seeking information on the procedure followed in choosing the winners after media reports suggested that “unfair non-scientific considerations” had influenced this year’s list of awardees.
The Vigyan Yuva Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Award is the rechristened avatar of the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Award, which has for over six decades been widely considered to be the most prestigious science award in India. It has now been made part of a larger group of science prizes called the Rashtriya Vigyan Puraskar.
This year, at least two prospective awardees recommended by an expert panel were dropped from the final list of winners. One of them is a vocal critic of the Narendra Modi-led government.
On Tuesday, the group of 176 academics wrote to Principal Scientific Advisor Ajay Sood echoing the concerns of their 26 colleagues.
“We are in agreement with the spirit, intent and the text of the letter sent by 26 of our colleagues,” they said. “We agree with them that the procedures and criteria for determining...
You may also like
MPHC & MPSJA Colloquium: 'Intellectual Property Rights Encourage Creativity, Innovation,' Says SC Justice Jitendra Maheshwari
Mumbai: Revd Dr. Ananda Maharajan's Book On Tamil Christian Heritage To Be Released Today At St. John's Tamil Church In Goregaon
"DMK's history marked by betrayal of TN's interests": BJP on Udhayanidhi Stalin's elevation as Dy CM
'An American Express-ion Of India's Importance': Anand Mahindra Lauds World's Largest American Express Headquarters In Gurugram