KOLKATA: If an adult woman was in a consensual sexual relationship, then her “mere assertion or claim” of being raped and impregnated on a false promise of marriage was not enough in the absence of proper evidence, to indict her male partner, Calcutta HC said while overturning a sessions court verdict sentencing a man.
In her Nov 5 judgment, Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay noted that the complainant had categorically stated she “willingly and without resistance” got into a physical relationship with the man, whom she later accused of rape. The man was convicted under IPC section 376 (rape) and sentenced to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment, by a Bankura additional sessions judge on July 12, 2011.
Disposing of the case, Justice Bandyopadhyay said: “The victim, being an adult woman, could not have been a prey to ‘ promise to marry ’ concept, foregoing her knowledge of subsequent possibilities, probabilities and eventualities if such promise was not acted upon.”
In her Nov 5 judgment, Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay noted that the complainant had categorically stated she “willingly and without resistance” got into a physical relationship with the man, whom she later accused of rape. The man was convicted under IPC section 376 (rape) and sentenced to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment, by a Bankura additional sessions judge on July 12, 2011.
Disposing of the case, Justice Bandyopadhyay said: “The victim, being an adult woman, could not have been a prey to ‘ promise to marry ’ concept, foregoing her knowledge of subsequent possibilities, probabilities and eventualities if such promise was not acted upon.”
You may also like
Donald Trump selects Mike Waltz as national security adviser, say reports
Talk of anti-conversion law in Maharashtra worries church leaders
Queen Camilla's health issue didn't stop her secretly paying tribute on Remembrance Sunday
Travis Kelce's ex hints Taylor Swift is the reason she's been pushed out of WAG clique
Perishers - 12th November 2024