CHANDIGARH: Punjab and Haryana high court has issued notice to O P Jindal Global University , Sonipat, on a petition by a postgraduate law student challenging its decision to declare him unsuccessful in an exam for allegedly using AI to generate "submissions" to questions on a particular subject.
Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri was hearing petitioner Kaustubh Shakkarwar's contention that the university's controller of examinations and the unfair means committee violated principles of natural justice by not giving him a hearing and producing documents crucial to the case.
Shakkarwar, a resident of Hyderabad Estate in Mumbai, is pursuing an LLM degree in intellectual property rights and technology law. According to the petition, the university was still to submit "sufficient proof" confirming the use of AI-generated material in Shakkarwar's exam submissions on the subject "Law and justice in a globalising world".
Shakkarwar, a practising IP lawyer and AI entrepreneur, also questioned if there was any clear rule prohibiting the use of AI in an exam.
On being informed that he didn't clear the exam, Shakkarwar appealed the decision before the examination appellate committee. He alleged that the controller of examinations dismissed the appeal without a hearing after a four-month delay. Justice Puri will next hear the case on Nov 14.
Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri was hearing petitioner Kaustubh Shakkarwar's contention that the university's controller of examinations and the unfair means committee violated principles of natural justice by not giving him a hearing and producing documents crucial to the case.
Shakkarwar, a resident of Hyderabad Estate in Mumbai, is pursuing an LLM degree in intellectual property rights and technology law. According to the petition, the university was still to submit "sufficient proof" confirming the use of AI-generated material in Shakkarwar's exam submissions on the subject "Law and justice in a globalising world".
Shakkarwar, a practising IP lawyer and AI entrepreneur, also questioned if there was any clear rule prohibiting the use of AI in an exam.
On being informed that he didn't clear the exam, Shakkarwar appealed the decision before the examination appellate committee. He alleged that the controller of examinations dismissed the appeal without a hearing after a four-month delay. Justice Puri will next hear the case on Nov 14.
You may also like
2024 US elections: Why Joe Rogan endorsed Donald Trump following his podcast with Elon Musk
Lady Gaga, Katy Perry and Ricky Martin among celebs joining Kamala Harris at final rallies
Mental health: Understand from these 5 signs that you are toxic to yourself, you are spoiling your mental health
Teams deployed in Haryana to nab mastermind of Baba Siddiqui's murder: Mumbai Police
Maharashtra Assembly Elections 2024: Amid Strains With INDIA bloc, Samajwadi Party Decides To Go Solo