NEW DELHI: Observing that politics should be kept out of the issue of faith and there was nothing prima facie to prove that contaminated ghee was used to make laddus at Tirumala Tirupati temple , Supreme Court on Monday slammed Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu for going public with his allegation of adulterated prasadam without any basis, and hurting the sentiments of crores of devotees.
Hearing a batch of four petitions, including one filed by Subramanian Swamy, a bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan said prasadam was not sent for test and repeatedly asked the state and Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) to show evidence that contaminated ghee was used to make laddus. The court said according to the report, a sample of rejected ghee was tested.
"There are some disclaimers in the lab report. It is not clear at all. It says rejected ghee was subjected to the test. If you yourself have ordered an investigation, what was the need to go to the press? The report came in July and the statement was made in Sept. The report says that was not the material used for prasadam," the bench said at the outset.
It sought answers from the state govt and TTD on how they came to the conclusion that contaminated ghee was used to make the laddus. Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for TTD, said the test was conducted after devotees complained about change in taste and recounted the events leading to the controversy.
SC to decide on laddu probe transfer to independent agency
The bench again said that when there was no material to show contamination of prasadam, then there could not be any justification for the CM to make comments before an FIR was lodged and an SIT formed. The court said it would also decide whether the probe should be transferred from the state-appointed SIT to an independent agency and would seek the assistance of solicitor general Tushar Mehta on this issue.
“When you have ordered an investigation through the SIT, what was the necessity to go to the press? When you hold a constitutional office, you should maintain some restraint. We expect gods to be kept away from politics,” the bench said. “We are prima facie of the view that when the investigation was under process, it was not appropriate for the high constitutional authority to make a statement which can affect the sentiments of crores of people. We find that it would be appropriate if the SG assists us on whether the SIT by the state should continue or the probe should be by an independent agency,” the bench said and posted the hearing to Thursday.
Senior advocate Rajashekhar Rao, appearing for Swamy, said the CM’s statements were refuted by the executive officer of TTD who said such ghee was never used. He said the probe should have some kind of supervision.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, for Andhra govt, said Swamy’s petition was not bona fide and was filed to espouse cause of previous YSRCP govt.
Hearing a batch of four petitions, including one filed by Subramanian Swamy, a bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan said prasadam was not sent for test and repeatedly asked the state and Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) to show evidence that contaminated ghee was used to make laddus. The court said according to the report, a sample of rejected ghee was tested.
"There are some disclaimers in the lab report. It is not clear at all. It says rejected ghee was subjected to the test. If you yourself have ordered an investigation, what was the need to go to the press? The report came in July and the statement was made in Sept. The report says that was not the material used for prasadam," the bench said at the outset.
It sought answers from the state govt and TTD on how they came to the conclusion that contaminated ghee was used to make the laddus. Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for TTD, said the test was conducted after devotees complained about change in taste and recounted the events leading to the controversy.
SC to decide on laddu probe transfer to independent agency
The bench again said that when there was no material to show contamination of prasadam, then there could not be any justification for the CM to make comments before an FIR was lodged and an SIT formed. The court said it would also decide whether the probe should be transferred from the state-appointed SIT to an independent agency and would seek the assistance of solicitor general Tushar Mehta on this issue.
“When you have ordered an investigation through the SIT, what was the necessity to go to the press? When you hold a constitutional office, you should maintain some restraint. We expect gods to be kept away from politics,” the bench said. “We are prima facie of the view that when the investigation was under process, it was not appropriate for the high constitutional authority to make a statement which can affect the sentiments of crores of people. We find that it would be appropriate if the SG assists us on whether the SIT by the state should continue or the probe should be by an independent agency,” the bench said and posted the hearing to Thursday.
Senior advocate Rajashekhar Rao, appearing for Swamy, said the CM’s statements were refuted by the executive officer of TTD who said such ghee was never used. He said the probe should have some kind of supervision.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, for Andhra govt, said Swamy’s petition was not bona fide and was filed to espouse cause of previous YSRCP govt.
You may also like
US election 2024: Polling station chaos amid reports of man with gun and bomb squad swoop
Assam CM visits Dighalipkuri amid protest over tree cutting in Guwahati
Athiya went out to enjoy the holidays with KL Rahul
Premier League strikes new deal to broadcast more than 200 matches for free
You can also apply for these posts in BOB
